Well, yes, it’s a debate that should never be had, except in the U.S…should there be a corporate income tax? Ha. So, the answer is pretty simple.
A no-brainer and Citizens for Tax Justice explains it:
First, a business that is structured as a corporation can hold onto its profits for years before paying them out to its shareholders, who only then (if ever) will pay personal income tax on the income. With no corporate income tax, high-income people could create shell corporations to indefinitely defer paying individual income taxes on much of their income.
Second, even when corporate profits are paid out (as stock dividends), only a fraction are paid to individuals rather than to tax-exempt entities not subject to the personal income tax.
Third, the corporate income tax is ultimately borne by shareholders and therefore is a very progressive tax, which means any attempt to replace it with another tax would likely result in a less progressive tax system.
More detail at that link. But, the above pretty much sums it up.


One Response to “A Debate We Shouldn’t Need To Have”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[…] few days ago, I wondered why we anyone would think that there needs to be a debate about whether there should be a corporate […]